Trend AnalysisEngineeringMixed Methods

CHIPS and VAPOR: Collagen-Based 3D Bioprinting Achieves Internally Perfusable Tissue Scaffolds

The central obstacle in tissue engineering has remained consistent for two decades: engineered tissues thicker than approximately 200 micrometers cannot sustain cell viability through passive diffu...

By Sean K.S. Shin
This blog summarizes research trends based on published paper abstracts. Specific numbers or findings may contain inaccuracies. For scholarly rigor, always consult the original papers cited in each post.

The central obstacle in tissue engineering has remained consistent for two decades: engineered tissues thicker than approximately 200 micrometers cannot sustain cell viability through passive diffusion alone. They require internal vascularizationโ€”perfusable channels that deliver nutrients and oxygen to cells deep within the construct. A study in Science Advances by Shiwarski et al. (2025) presents a platform that addresses this challenge using an advanced form of freeform reversible embedding of suspended hydrogels (FRESH) bioprinting. Their collagen-based high-resolution internally perfusable scaffolds (CHIPS), integrated with a vascular and perfusion organ-on-a-chip reactor (VAPOR), demonstrate glucose-responsive insulin secretion in a pancreatic-like constructโ€”moving from structural achievement toward functional tissue engineering.

The Research Landscape

The Vascularization Problem

Organ-on-a-chip and microfluidic systems have substantially improved the physiological relevance of in vitro models. However, most current platforms rely on polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) or other synthetic materials that impose constraints: non-native mechanical properties, limited geometric complexity, and inability to undergo cell-driven remodeling into functional tissues. The material itself becomes the limiting factor.

Biological materialsโ€”particularly collagensโ€”avoid these limitations but are difficult to 3D print with precision. Collagen solutions are liquid at room temperature and gel slowly, making them incompatible with conventional layer-by-layer printing in air. The FRESH technique, first developed by the Feinberg laboratory, solves this by printing collagen within a thermoreversible gelatin microparticle support bath that holds the printed structure in place during gelation.

What CHIPS Achieves

Shiwarski et al. advance FRESH bioprinting in several specific ways:

Improved print fidelity. The study reports enhanced resolution that enables fabrication of internally perfusable channels within collagen scaffolds. These channels are not simple tubes punched through a solid block; they are printed as integral features of the construct geometry, with controlled diameter, branching, and connectivity.

Size-dependent molecular permeability. Perfused molecules diffuse from the channels into the surrounding scaffold at rates that depend on molecular size and channel geometry. This is functionally important: it means the scaffold can deliver nutrients to cells at controlled rates, mimicking the size-selective permeability of biological capillaries.

Multi-material bioprinting. The platform supports simultaneous printing of different ECM compositions and cell types within a single construct. This spatial patterning capability is essential for creating tissues with organized cellular architecture rather than homogeneous cell distributions.

Functional demonstration. The most compelling result is a pancreatic-like CHIPS construct that contains insulin-secreting cells and develops vascular endothelial cadherin-positive (VE-cadherinโบ) vascular-like networks. This construct responds to glucose stimulation with insulin secretionโ€”a functional output that goes beyond structural mimicry.

The FRESH Bioprinting Ecosystem

The CHIPS work builds on a maturing body of FRESH-based research. Moss et al. (2024) demonstrated FRESH bioprinting of collagen types I, II, and III, expanding the range of ECM proteins that can be printed and enabling tissue-specific material selection. Wu et al. (2023) optimized FRESH parameters to improve 3D bioprinting capabilities, systematically characterizing how support bath properties affect print quality.

Kontakis et al. (2025) applied FRESH to trabecular-bone mimicking scaffolds, showing that the technique can reproduce complex porous architectures relevant to bone repair. Chaurasia et al. (2024) extended FRESH to chitosan-based bioinks, demonstrating that the embedded printing approach generalizes beyond collagen to other hydrogel systems.

Chen et al. (2023) developed a variant of FRESH bioprinting that enables tunable elastic modulus and porosity in complex biological structures, providing additional design parameters for tissue engineers.

Complementary Approaches

The broader bioprinting field is pursuing vascularization through multiple strategies. Xing et al. (2025) provide a comprehensive review of 3D bioprinting technologies for cell-laden constructs, noting that FRESH represents one of several promising approaches including sacrificial templating, coaxial printing, and self-assembly methods.

Stang et al. (2025) used FRESH to engineer skeletal muscle tissue with complex multipennate myofiber architectures, demonstrating that the technique can achieve the geometric complexity required for muscleโ€”a tissue type with stringent alignment requirements.

Critical Analysis: Claims and Evidence

<
ClaimEvidenceVerdict
CHIPS achieves internally perfusable collagen scaffoldsConfocal imaging, perfusion testing, molecular permeability measurementsโœ… Supported โ€” multiple characterization methods confirm perfusability
Multi-material bioprinting controls 3D spatial patterningFluorescent imaging of distinct materials within single constructsโœ… Supported โ€” spatial control demonstrated at relevant length scales
Pancreatic CHIPS secretes insulin in response to glucoseGlucose-stimulated insulin secretion assayโœ… Supported โ€” functional output measured, though magnitude not compared to native tissue
VE-cadherinโบ vascular-like networks form within the constructImmunostaining for VE-cadherinโœ… Supported โ€” network formation confirmed, but connectivity and perfusability of these networks not fully characterized
Platform is suitable for disease modeling and cell replacement therapyStated as future applicationโš ๏ธ Not yet demonstrated โ€” logical next step but requires validation

Open Questions

  • Long-term culture stability: How do CHIPS constructs behave over weeks to months of continuous perfusion? Do the collagen channels maintain structural integrity, or do they remodel in ways that compromise perfusion?
  • Scale-up to organ dimensions: The demonstrated constructs are small. Can CHIPS be scaled to organ-relevant sizes (centimeters) while maintaining channel patency and cell viability throughout?
  • Immune compatibility: Collagen is generally biocompatible, but implanted constructs will encounter immune responses. How do CHIPS constructs perform in immunocompetent animal models?
  • Reproducibility and manufacturing: FRESH bioprinting requires specialized equipment and expertise. What is the construct-to-construct variability, and can the process be standardized for clinical manufacturing?
  • Functional maturation: The glucose-responsive insulin secretion is a promising functional readout, but how does it compare quantitatively to native pancreatic islet function? Is the response sufficient for therapeutic applications?
  • What This Means for the Field

    CHIPS and VAPOR represent a meaningful step in tissue engineering: the transition from bioprinted structures that look like tissue to bioprinted structures that function like tissue. The glucose-responsive insulin secretion demonstrates that internally perfused collagen scaffolds can support not just cell survival but coordinated cellular function. The combination of FRESH bioprinting's geometric precision with multi-material capabilities opens design space for engineering tissues with organized cellular architecture.

    Explore related bioprinting and tissue engineering research through ORAA ResearchBrain.

    References (8)

    [1] Shiwarski, D. J., Hudson, A. R., Tashman, J., et al. (2025). 3D bioprinting of collagen-based high-resolution internally perfusable scaffolds for engineering fully biologic tissue systems. Science Advances.
    [2] Moss, S., Shiwarski, D. J., & Feinberg, A. (2024). FRESH 3D Bioprinting of Collagen Types I, II, and III. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering.
    [3] Wu, C. A., Zhu, Y., & Venkatesh, A. (2023). Optimization of Freeform Reversible Embedding of Suspended Hydrogel Microspheres for Substantially Improved Three-Dimensional Bioprinting Capabilities. Tissue Engineering: Part C.
    [4] Kontakis, M. G., Moulin, M., & Andersson, B. (2025). Trabecular-bone mimicking osteoconductive collagen scaffolds: an optimized 3D printing approach using FRESH. 3D Printing in Medicine.
    [5] Chaurasia, P., Singh, R., & Mahto, S. K. (2024). FRESH-based 3D bioprinting of complex biological geometries using chitosan bioink. Biofabrication.
    [6] Chen, Z., Huang, C., & Liu, H. (2023). 3D bioprinting of complex biological structures with tunable elastic modulus and porosity using FRESH. Bio-Design and Manufacturing.
    [7] Xing, Q., Liu, Y., & Thomas, J. (2025). 3D bioprinting of cell-laden constructs: technologies, bioink design, and biomedical applications. Biomedical Materials.
    [8] Stang, M. A., Lee, A., & Bliley, J. M. (2025). Engineering 3D Skeletal Muscle Tissue with Complex Multipennate Myofiber Architectures. bioRxiv.

    Explore this topic deeper

    Search 290M+ papers, detect research gaps, and find what hasn't been studied yet.

    Click to remove unwanted keywords

    Search 8 keywords โ†’